Detail Article

Conservative Dentistry Journal / Vol. 6. No. 1. 2016-01: 65 - 71


(Comparison of Marginal Leakage of Fluoride-Containing Composite Resin with Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement in Class V Restoration)


Perbandingan Kebocoran Tepi Resin Komposit yang Mengandung Fluor dengan Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement pada Restorasi Kelas V

  1. Nabilah Ashari
    Mahasiswa Pendidikan Dokter Gigi Fakultas Kedokteran Gigi Universitas Airlangga Surabaya-Indonesia
    -
  2. Ketut Suardita
    Staf Pengajar Departemen Konservasi Gigi Kedokteran Gigi Fakultas Kedokteran Gigi Universitas Airlangga Surabaya-Indonesia
    suardita@hotmail.com
  3. Nanik Zubaidah
    Staf Pengajar Departemen Konservasi Gigi Kedokteran Gigi Fakultas Kedokteran Gigi Universitas Airlangga Surabaya-Indonesia
    -

Abstract

Background: Microleakage around dental restorative materials is a major problem in clinical dentistry. Class V restoration have a greater tendency to microleakage. Composite resin and resin modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) are restorative materials for class V. Different restorative materials have  a different composition, setting reaction and nature of physical and/or chemical bonds with the dental tissues.Purpose: The purpose of this study was to analyze the difference of microleakage betweenfluoride-containing composite resin and RMGIC. Materials and Methods: 30 maxilarry first premolars were randomly divided into three groups. Class V cavities were prepared and the cavities were restored with composite resin (Group 1), fluoride-containing composite resin (Group 2), RMGIC (Group 3). The teeh were subjected to 0,5% methylene blue dye penetration followed by buco-palatal sectioning. Dye penetration was recorded at gingival margin. The cut sections were evaluated under a digital microscope and the data was analyzed with Mann Whitney test.Results: There is no significant difference between composite resin and fluoride-containing composite resin. RMGIC has significant difference when compare to composite resin andfluoride-containing composite resin.Conclusion: RMGIC showed less microleakage than fluoride-containing composite resin in class V restoration.

Keyword: microleakage, composite resin , class v restoration,

Abstrak

-


Daftar Pustaka

  1. Yadav, G, Comparative Evaluation of Marginal Leakage of Different Restorative Materials in Deciduous Molars: An in vitro Study. -, International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, 2012.
  2. Garg, N , Textbook of Operative Dentistry. 2nd ed. India, Jaypee Brother, 2013.
  3. Hatrick, CD, Dental Materials: Clinical Applications for Dental Assistants and Dental Hygienists. 2nd ed. USA, Elsevier, 2011.

Visitor Article : 12273

Visitor Download : 33